Synthetic food dyes and their potential impact on children's neurobehavioral health have become a focal point of discussion. Recently, California Governor Gavin Newsom enacted the California School Food Safety Act, prohibiting public schools in the state from serving or selling foods containing six synthetic dyes starting in 2028. In Michigan, protests erupted outside the Battle Creek headquarters of WK Kellogg Co. after the company faced renewed criticism for not fulfilling its pledge to eliminate synthetic dyes from U.S. products, including cereals.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to approve these dyes, asserting that there is insufficient evidence to link them to issues such as ADHD, hyperactivity, or lack of focus. The list of foods containing synthetic dyes is extensive, and the difficulty in assessing the risk to children adds to the controversy. When federal and state guidelines diverge, it becomes challenging to determine which foods contain these dyes and whether they should be avoided.
Despite limited evidence of a direct neurobehavioral connection, experts believe that some children may be more susceptible than others. Many experts support California's act, hoping it will inspire other states to take similar actions and compel food manufacturers to reformulate their products. Melanie Benesh, Vice President of Government Affairs for the Environmental Working Group, emphasizes that the act creates a better learning environment for students by ensuring they can focus and maintain control over their bodies.
The debate over synthetic food dyes has prompted Science News to explore their history and the science behind their use. Synthetic dyes are added to food to enhance color, each with a unique molecular structure that allows for a variety of hues. These dyes serve no nutritional purpose and are primarily used to make food more appealing, especially to children. Foods containing synthetic dyes often do not carry warning labels in the U.S., making it necessary to check individual product labels to identify them.
The history of synthetic dyes is fraught with safety concerns. Early versions, including lead chromate and arsenic, were highly toxic. In 1950, a dangerous dye, Orange 1, caused illness in children who consumed Halloween candy. Despite this, many modern synthetic dyes were approved by the FDA in the early 20th century. The potential harm of these dyes became a topic of public discussion in the 1970s, leading to ongoing research and debate.
California's decision to ban six synthetic dyes was based on a 2021 report from the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. The report analyzed 25 clinical trials and found a credible link between synthetic dyes and behavioral issues in children. However, establishing a direct causal relationship remains challenging due to the lack of definitive studies comparing children on dye-free diets with those consuming dyed foods.
Animal studies have shown that synthetic dyes can influence neurological behavior, but the doses used in these studies are often higher than those found in typical human diets. Despite this, Mark Miller from California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment believes these studies are valuable for identifying which dyes and doses may cause negative effects.
The decision to ban synthetic dyes in California has been met with mixed reactions. Critics argue that consistent food regulations across states and federal agencies are essential for public confidence. Sean Taylor from the International Association of Color Manufacturers notes that the FDA's review of the literature concluded there was no causal link between synthetic dyes and behavioral issues in children.
The lack of extensive research on the dangers of synthetic dyes complicates the debate. While the FDA and California's 2021 Health Assessment differ in their conclusions, both acknowledge the need for more research. Amy Gilson from California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment emphasizes that while definitive causal data is lacking, the evidence suggests the need for action.
Source link: https://www.sciencenews.org
